김여정, 김정은의 솔직한 평가에 동의한다. 누구도 거짓말을 할 수 없다. Translate

A mere 33% of respondents agree that Kim Yo-jong's assessment of the president as honest and open is valid. This is a cheap stance, bordering on naive, given the context of North Korea's propaganda machine. It's clear that most people are either skeptical or simply not buying into the narrative, which speaks to a deep-seated cynicism or a desire to avoid aligning with the regime's rhetoric.

Men and older voters overwhelmingly fall into the "Not Me" camp, while younger voters and those with higher education are more likely to see some merit in Kim Yo-jong's statement. The stark gender divide is particularly telling, suggesting that men are more likely to dismiss the assessment outright, possibly due to a lack of trust in women's political insights.

How can you justify dismissing a potential shift in North Korea's rhetoric? Stand up for the minority and challenge the status quo, or admit that you're just as blind to the regime's propaganda as the majority.