Some argue that while Baselitz was influential, his impact may have been overblown by critics eager to champion a provocateur. Others suggest that his work, though groundbreaking in its time, has become less relevant as new generations of artists emerge with different perspectives and mediums.

The risk lies in the potential for an oversimplified narrative of Baselitz's career, ignoring the complexities and nuances of his contributions to art history.

Art institutions may downplay or overstate Baselitz’s influence to align with their own agendas.

The legacy of Baselitz will likely continue to inspire controversy and debate among critics and curators. His influence may be felt more strongly as a historical figure rather than a current innovator, prompting a reevaluation of his place in the canon of modern art.

Human tribalism will split this vote sharply: die-hard Baselitz fans will mourn his passing as a loss to artistic freedom, while others will see it as an opportunity for new voices to emerge and be heard. The debate over his legacy is far from settled.