Jack Schlossberg's candidacy is a waste of time for anyone serious about politics.

Supporters argue that Schlossberg’s youthful energy and social media savvy could bring new voters into the political process, especially younger demographics often disengaged from traditional politics. They see his candidacy as a breath of fresh air in an otherwise stale system.

Schlossberg's reliance on superficial tactics risks alienating serious voters who demand concrete policy proposals.

Potential backing from tech-savvy donors interested in leveraging social media influence.

Schlossberg's candidacy could set a dangerous precedent for future elections, where candidates focus more on personal branding and media presence than actual governance. This shift towards superficiality risks eroding public trust in political institutions further.

Human tribalism will likely split along generational lines, with younger voters supporting Schlossberg’s flashy approach while older demographics dismiss him as a distraction from real issues. The debate will be polarized, with each side entrenched in their views of what constitutes effective political engagement.