Supporters might argue that Dillon's exhibition aims to bring global attention to West African art, potentially sparking interest and dialogue about the region’s cultural richness. They could claim that his work is an attempt to bridge gaps between different cultures rather than exploit them. However, this perspective overlooks the nuanced issues of representation and the importance of engaging directly with source communities.

The risk lies in perpetuating harmful stereotypes and undermining genuine efforts by artists from West Africa to gain recognition on their own terms.

Dillon's commercial interests may overshadow his ethical responsibilities towards cultural authenticity and respect.

This controversy will likely polarize public opinion sharply along lines of cultural sensitivity versus artistic freedom. Those who value cultural integrity will see Dillon’s work as a clear example of exploitation, while others may view it through the lens of artistic expression and global exchange.

The debate over cultural appropriation in art is set to intensify, with Dillon's exhibition serving as a focal point for discussions about ethical responsibilities and the commodification of culture. This will likely lead to increased scrutiny of similar projects by Western artists engaging with non-Western traditions.