A rational person might argue that without concrete proof of phone-dumping, these accusations are baseless. The burden of proof lies with MacInnes's legal team, and until they present undeniable evidence, dismissing Wilson’s denial outright would be premature.

The risk here is that if the court finds Wilson guilty of destroying evidence, it could severely damage her credibility and case.

Wilson has a vested interest in portraying herself as a victim to maintain public support and weaken MacInnes's position.

This case sets a dangerous precedent for future defamation trials involving high-profile figures. If Wilson’s strategy is successful, it could embolden others to employ similar tactics, leading to an erosion of accountability in public discourse.

Human tribalism will likely split this vote down the middle. Fans and supporters of Wilson will rally behind her denial, while critics and those who see through the PR stunt will side with MacInnes. The outcome hinges on how much people trust each party’s version of events.