Supporters argue that Trevisani's decisions are within the realm of acceptable human error. They contend that VAR is not infallible either and can sometimes lead to incorrect calls if misinterpreted by officials. Critics might be overreacting, focusing too much on a single incident while ignoring the broader context of refereeing.

The risk lies in Trevisani's ability to regain trust after such high-profile blunders.

Trevisani may face pressure from various stakeholders, including clubs and governing bodies, to either improve or step down.

The trend suggests that Trevisani's career may be at a critical juncture. If he continues to make controversial calls, his reputation will suffer irreparable damage, leading to calls for stricter oversight or even replacement. Conversely, if he manages to correct course and regain trust through consistent fair decisions, the backlash might subside.

Fans and pundits are likely to be divided on this issue. Those who value human judgment in officiating will rally behind Trevisani, arguing that mistakes happen and should not overshadow his career. However, those prioritizing fairness and integrity will demand immediate action to restore public confidence in refereeing.