Roland Garros should be boycotted until equal prize money is guaranteed.

Some argue that historical precedents and financial constraints justify the current prize money structure at Roland Garros. They contend that changing long-standing traditions without addressing underlying economic realities could be counterproductive. Ultimately, they believe gradual reforms are more sustainable than radical actions like a boycott.

The risk lies in alienating sponsors and damaging the tournament's reputation if players push for immediate change without a clear plan.

Tournament organizers may prioritize maintaining tradition over addressing gender equality due to long-term financial benefits from established practices.

The debate over prize money at Roland Garros will likely intensify with each passing year, especially as younger generations demand more immediate action. This could lead to significant changes in tournament policies or even structural reforms within tennis governance.

Human tribalism will split this vote sharply along gender lines and career stages. Veteran players may be less inclined towards drastic measures like boycotts, while younger athletes are likely to push for immediate equality.