Critics argue that Pogačar's success is due to a combination of natural talent, meticulous training, and strategic race management. They contend that his rivals need to improve their own performances rather than blame him for their shortcomings. This perspective suggests that the focus should be on individual growth rather than collective resentment.

The risk lies in Pogačar's competitors becoming complacent or discouraged, leading to a stagnation of innovation and competition.

Sponsors and cycling teams may have vested interests in maintaining Pogačar’s dominance for financial reasons.

The future will likely see more aggressive strategies from Pogačar’s competitors aiming to break his streak. As the gap widens, the pressure on him to maintain his form increases, potentially leading to burnout or a sudden decline in performance.

Human tribalism will split this vote sharply; fans and sponsors will rally behind Pogačar's dominance while rivals and cycling purists will push back against what they see as an unfair monopoly on success.