Some might argue that this absence could be a strategic move to rest key players or test new formations. After all, every team has its backups who can step up in crucial moments. But the reality is that these substitutes rarely match the tactical acumen and experience of Ekuban and Baldanzi.

The risk lies in overestimating the depth of Genoa's squad to cover for such a significant loss.

Potential pressure from management or coaching staff to push players beyond their limits.

This decision sets a dangerous precedent for future matches where key players might be rested or injured. It forces Genoa to rely on depth that may not match the quality and experience of their regular starters. The question remains: how sustainable is this approach when every game counts?

The tribalism around this decision will likely split fans and analysts sharply. Those who support the move see it as a necessary risk for long-term gains, while critics view it as short-sighted and potentially damaging to immediate team performance.