Critics argue that focusing on standout players accurately reflects their immense value to teams and leagues. They contend that these stars are not just individuals but catalysts for success, driving fan engagement and revenue growth. The spotlight on them is justified by the outsized impact they have on game outcomes and league popularity.

The risk lies in over-relying on a few superstars without developing a robust pipeline of talent.

Teams may prioritize short-term success through star players at the expense of long-term sustainability.

As the current stars age or move on, leagues may face a crisis of identity if they haven’t invested in developing a diverse pool of future leaders. This could lead to a sudden shift in dynamics, with less reliance on individual brilliance and more emphasis on team cohesion and collective excellence.

The tribalism will likely split along lines of star worship versus team-first ideology. Fans and analysts who idolize the current stars will defend their dominance, while those focused on long-term growth will push for a shift in focus towards player development and balanced teams.