Critics argue that this move undermines the credibility of the Church by appointing someone who violated U.S. immigration laws, potentially alienating conservative Catholics who support stricter border control measures.

The risk lies in further polarizing an already divided congregation over issues of immigration and church leadership.

Some may see this as a political move to align the Church with progressive immigration policies.

This decision sets a precedent for future appointments that could further entrench ideological divides within the Catholic community, pitting those who value social justice against those who prioritize legal compliance and tradition.

The appointment will likely split the vote sharply along ideological lines. Progressive Catholics will hail it as a bold move towards inclusivity, while conservative members may view it as an affront to U.S. law and Church doctrine.